01 / Contention
Reports slow the transactions
Analytical scans hold resources on the system of record precisely when operational load is at its highest.
Solution · Workload offloading
Replicate Db2 for IBM i, Oracle, and other mission-critical databases into read-optimized targets using journal and log-based capture, so reporting stops competing with transactions.
The challenge
Reporting queries, APIs, and dashboards run against the same database that has to commit business transactions, and capacity is finite.
01 / Contention
Analytical scans hold resources on the system of record precisely when operational load is at its highest.
02 / Cost
Adding capacity to a licensed mission-critical platform just to serve read traffic is rarely the cheapest option.
03 / Shape
Applications expect caches, distributed SQL, or in-memory grids that the system of record was never designed to be.
How it works
Gluesync reads committed changes from the platform's native change mechanism and maintains a current read copy in whichever engine the consumers need.
Capture
Journal capture on Db2 for IBM i, LogMiner or XStream on Oracle, and log readers elsewhere keep source impact low.
Redirect
Target agents keep a cache, distributed SQL store, or in-memory grid aligned with the source continuously.
Protect
Allowed-operations forwarding and row filters bound exactly what the offload target is permitted to receive.
Gluesync capabilities
Pick the capture mechanism the source platform supports, then the target shape your consumers actually want.
Read committed changes from the platform's own change mechanism instead of polling tables.
Land the offloaded copy in the engine that serves the read workload best.
Control which operations are forwarded and watch the offload pipeline like any other route.
Talk with MOLO17 about capture on your source platform and the right read target, or start a Gluesync trial.